I had jury duty this morning for the first time in several years, and I found the whole thing very interesting. I didn't get picked to be on the actual jury. They only needed 7 people, and around 80 showed up; the juror numbers went from 1 to 200-and-something, so I assume there were a whole lot of no-shows. Presumably, nothing bad will happen to the people who didn't show when they were called.
After we checked in to verify our attendance, we were ushered into a courtroom to watch a video about the jury system in Florida. That was interesting, but I really didn't learn anything from the video. Next, the Clerk of Court told us what was going to happen. Then we had a break while the judge was negotiating plea bargains in his chambers. There were 14 cases on the docket for this week, but they had whittled it down to three by this morning. After the plea bargaining session, there was only one man for trial.
The judge called up the first 24 people in numerical order. I was number 66, and I would have been first in the second batch, had they needed a second batch. Each lawyer got to question the prospective jurors, and I found that to be interesting and enlightening. Most of the 24 people were not married, which was my first surprise. Most did not have children, although some of the single ones did. Of the 80-odd people in the jury pool, only one was African American and none appeared to be Asian American. The defendant was a young African American man, and his Public Defender was a white woman in her early 30s. The Prosecutor was a mixed-race woman, also in her early 30s.
The alleged crime was a failure to register with the state as a convicted sexual predator. Florida requires that convicted sexual offenders and predators register with the sheriff within 48 hours of being released from police custody or of moving to a new address. Evidently the District Attorney felt that this guy didn't do that, so they put him on trial. This raised a number of questions in my mind, all of which hinted at layers of irony that I would have loved to be able to explore.
First, if this guy is found guilty of not registering in a timely manner, are they going to put him in jail for that? He's not in jail for being a convicted sexual predator, but would justice be well served by jailing him for not registering or for not doing so in a timely manner?
Second, if they have the guy in custody, which they obviously did, why not just make him register on the spot and forget about the rest of it? Why spend the kind of money it takes to stage a jury trial for a "crime" that appears to be totally victimless? They already convicted him of being a sexual predator and turned him loose. Why not take a lesson from traditional teacher-practice and just subtract 10 points from his final "grade" for turning in a late assignment?
Third, the prosecutor was essentially in the unenviable position of having to prove a negative--beyond a reasonable doubt. The charge was that the guy DIDN'T do what he was supposed to do, not that he actually DID something. Anybody who has had any experience in filling out and/or filing paperwork with a governmental entity or a large corporation knows intuitively that you can never know beyond a reasonable doubt that any paperwork you might fill out and/or file ever gets to where it's supposed to be in a timely manner.
The prosecuting attorney was a bright, personable young woman, and the defense attorney was likewise. I'm half tempted to go to the actual trial the day after tomorrow to see how these two handle the case. If it didn't start at 9 o'clock in the morning, and if I didn't have to be somewhere else at 8 o'clock that same day, I think I would. As it is, I'll have to put my curiosity on hold.
ED
Recent Comments